Sunday, 19 Jan, 2025

International

Manmohan summoned in coal scam case

News Desk |
Update: 2015-03-11 04:49:00
Manmohan summoned in coal scam case Manmohan Singh

A Delhi court on Wednesday summoned former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, former Coal Secretary P.C. Parakh and industrialist Kumar Mangalam Birla and others as accused in a coal block allocation scam case.

Rejecting the CBI's plea for closing the case, Special Judge Bharat Prasahar asked all the accused persons to appear on April 8, the next date of hearing.

The CBI had earlier sought closure of the case. However, when the Special Judge pulled it up for filing a patchy probe report, it filed a revised one and took a U-turn, stating that “there is prima facie enough material on record” to prosecute Mr. Parakh and Mr. Birla.

The case pertains to the allocation of coal blocks to Hindalco, owned by the Aditya Birla Group, allegedly in violation of rules.

The CBI last year lodged an FIR against Mr. Parakh, Mr. Birla and others, alleging that Mr. Parakh had reversed his earlier decision not to allocate coal blocks to Hindalco and shown undue favour to it.

The former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh told reporters at Parliament house "I am sure that the truth will prevail and I will get a chance to put forward my case with all the facts. I have always said I am open for legal scrutiny. Of course I am upset, but this is part of life."

CBI records statement of Manmohan

Earlier, on January 20, 2015, the CBI has recorded the statement of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in connection with alleged irregularities in the allocation of an Odisha coal block to industrialist Kumar Mangalam Birla’s company Hindalco.

Although CBI officials confirmed that Mr. Singh’s statement had been recorded, they remained tight-lipped over when exactly the agency approached him.The former Prime Minister’s statement has been recorded following a direction by the Special CBI Court last month. Observing that a concerted effort was being made to manipulate the entire government machinery so as to protect the interest of Hindalco, the Court had directed the agency to examine the then Coal Minister (Mr. Singh) on various aspects of the coal block allocation to the company.

The CBI had sought closure of the case, in which Mr. Birla, former Coal Secretary P.C. Parakh and others were named as accused. However, the court directed the agency to carry out further investigations in the case and submit a progress report on January 27, stating that before examining the matter further, it was appropriate that the then Coal Minister was first examined.

The CBI had in October 2013 registered the case alleging that Mr. Birla and Mr. Parakh, along with other accused persons, entered into a criminal conspiracy to facilitate partial allocation of the Talabira coal block to Hindalco in 2005.The move prompted the PMO to issue a detailed statement in Dr. Singh’s defence. The PMO said Dr. Singh was “satisfied” that the final decision was “entirely appropriate” and based “on the merits of the case placed before him”, and that he had formally endorsed the Coal Ministry’s decision to overturn the 25th screening committee’s recommendation to accommodate Kumar Mangalam Birla’s company for the allocation of the coal block in question.

The Hindu had last July reported that the CBI was then planning to seek clarifications from the former Prime Minister as a witness in the coal block allocations scam. Dr. Singh held the charge of the Coal Ministry for almost five years from the time the United Progressive Alliance came to power in 2004. Several coal block allocations made during the period are under CBI scrutiny.

Keywords: coal scam, coal block allocation, Coalgate scam, former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Kumar Mangalam Birla, P.C. Parekh

Source: thehindu.com

BDST: 1450 HRS, MAR 11

All rights reserved. Sale, redistribution or reproduction of information/photos/illustrations/video/audio contents on this website in any form without prior permission from banglanews24.com are strictly prohibited and liable to legal action.